| EJournal Home Page | Vol. 1, No. 1: Contents |
Computer Writing, Rhetoric and Literature
<1> "Not Maimed but Malted" is an essay about the use of hypertexts in freshmen composition. It marks several points in recent discussions about the role of graphical elements in composition. It also counters initial questions about potential dangers of moving away from more purely verbal compositions by calling for composition instruction which incorporates the non-linear and visual potential of hypertexts into new forms of writing. In addition to recounting the critical debate over of the role of hypertexts in the classroom, this document illuminates that discussion by examining samples of student hypertexts.
<2> The nodes pictured here lead to critical reviews of student hypertexts and sketch elements of an emerging hypertextual rhetoric. You can move down to the student samples section by clicking here, or reach the reviews of student work by clicking on the images above; you can also reach them in the course of reading through the general discussion below.
<4> The distance we've come in the last four years prompts us to reevaluate Halio's article not in the light of platform distinctions but writing differences. Stuart Moulthrop and Nancy Kaplan pick up on this new focus in "Seeing through the Interface: Computers and the Future of Composition." In addition to providing several critiques of Halio's methods, Moulthrop and Kaplan move the discussion toward the examination of writing itself, and take issue with Halio's privileging of the typographic. Halio attributed the disparity in student paper quality in part to the graphic orientation of the Macintosh:
<5> Moulthrop and Kaplan take up the challenge presented by Halio and offer their own advice for redefining acceptable prose and for including graphic and hypertextual elements in our thinking about writing. They close by calling for a new way of seeing, a reexamination of rhetoric beyond the typographic. A similar call is made by Jay David Bolter in Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. The rest of this project will try to answer that call.
<6> [return to top] One way to rethink rhetoric beyond the typographical is to critically examine hypertextual compositions and come to terms with their areas of success and failure. In the Spring of 1994 students in my freshmen composition class constructed research paper hypertexts. Students used a Hypercard template to link texts, sounds and images in order to present an in depth exploratory research project. The samples chosen reveal both promise and problems. In part, I attribute this to the difficulty of learning new media. It should be noted as well that even traditional texts come with relative measures of success and failure. The point of examining the samples is not to claim the unqualified success of these hypertext projects; rather, I am trying to look at the shortcomings and the accomplishments of the projects in order to draw some conclusions about hypertextual rhetoric and style. <7> Finally, I will draw some conclusions about the various calls in the dialogue concerning the future of writing and the use of hypertexts in the computer classroom.
If you have something to contribute to this project, or if you can help me by offering a review, or if you just have a comment or question, fill out the form below and submit it to me. Thanks.
Return to the CWRL home page, or to Daniel's home page.
iamdan