Find a visual artifact, i.e., a photograph, advertisement, campaign ad, cartoon, etc., and decode its message. Why did it catch your attention? What are some of the arguments it makes?
Ask the similar questions that you would ask about a written argument:
the larger context in which you find the visual artifact
the audience it is aimed at
ethos, pathos, logos
is it effective or not? do you think it might misfire or offend some people?
Alternatively, you can compose a visual argument of your own by combining two or more images to create a new message. Then explain your choice.
Write half a page to one page analysis (single spaced, Times New Roman 12 font). Be sure to include the visual artifact.
I really like this ad because of the great visual lushness of the images presents a futuristic scene at once frightening and enticing, reminiscent in the feel of the lighting of parts of Scott's Blade Runner. The cinematic technology, with its telephoto lenses and mattes, is supplemented by the electronically generated slow-motion flying hammer and blinding white light that fills the hall at the end of the spot. The aural code is complex. The meaningless sloganeering of the tyrant puppet on the screen continues unceasingly, destructive of thinking, of reflection. The marching feet, the great hall ambiance, the electronic rumble, all work to create an aura of dread, of industrialized enterprises and great human misery. The reason that apple is doing this is to show the fact that because of their new creative Macintosh computer, consumers at the time didn’t have to fear the world that they show in their commercial. In a less overt way, the people in the commercial also evoke the haunting specter of joblessness, of the displacement of humans by machines, a concern that has become increasingly manifest for Americans in the 1990s and 1980s. Apple tries to ease the people watching the commercial by encouraging that if their product is bought, fear of such emptiness will cease.