While the first book of The Book of Khalid, "In The Exchange," is dedicated to his Brother Man, the second book, "In The Temple," is dedicted to his Mother Nature.
What do you make of these thematic divisions in the novel?
Feel free to comment on any aspect of this reading that you found interesting, choose a couple of juicy lines, or respond to your classmates' thoughts.
The form and style in which the Book of Khalid is written feels really...dated? to me. Not that the subject or the story is dated but there's seems to be this wierd, like, "victorian glam" style to the narrative which is full of excited, witty almost hyberbolic descriptions. It reminds me of Dickens and others. I think this, along with the massive amounts of historical and literay aluusion, does a couple of things to the novel. It grounds it in this epic Westren literatary tradition that follows this "framed" storytelling mode and it also helps the slightly fantasic elements of Khalid's life more concievable( for instance his meeting with Boss Tweed.) I don't know it's an odd book...when i'm reading the narrators comments I feel like I moving at a break neck pace, whereas with Khalid's story things slow down and seem to have a more "real-time" fell about them.