Reviews on the version 1 of your draft

Focus (Overall quality: 4.0 )

Reviewer

Comments

Reviewer 1

You begin with saying you don''t know who you are, but then you explain that you don''t drink, etc. There is no apparent thesis, rather just an intro paragraph, thus the 3. You explain who you are in the Alice metaphor, but only talk about it in the second paragraph. What is is paragraph "Dumpster Diving" about?

Reviewer 2

The purpose of this paper does not seem sharp clear. The thesis does not contain the authorÕs objective, and I cannot pinpoint what the author is comparing his/her college experience to. Quotes from literature are included in relevance to the thesis. The conclusion had good insight, but did not effectively intertwine the findings from the literature into the final point of the essay.

Reviewer 3

First of all, I enjoyed the author humorous style. It was a funny little ramble through the UT experience. In the sense of humor and tone of the essay, the focus did not start and was consistently playful throughout.


I felt like this was the thesis statement:Ó What I enjoy about college is this: freedom to run my own schedule (because I manage time better when it is entirely up to me), spending time exploring interesting buildings without holding anyone up, going to events with free food, and finding awesome things that people throw in the trash. ÒHowever, I struggled to find a solid thesis. Moreover, I felt that since I could not find a solid thesis, that the essay tended to lose focus throughout. There was not a solid summary of the paper and overall each paragraph spoke of a different topic.


The author did pick a broad theme in which a strong contrast to Victorian times and today''s college experience was outlined. I felt it was a smart approach that would greatly benefit from improved focus. Nail down a thesis and then expand the focus of the essay from there.

Reviewer 4

There isn''t a strong thesis statement. The first paragraph gives a purpose to the paper, but seems to contradict itself. I don''t know whether the paper is about using college as a place to discover one''s self or a place to "stay tucked away until I''m different, or sometimes ''somebody else.''" Also, that sentence doesn''t make much sense to me. You act like somebody else until you''ve found yourself?

Even though the organization and flow was poor, there was some type of focus with all the episodic paragraphs. It was all about yourself. You compared yourself to Alice, Jude, and Victorian stereotypes.

Organization (Overall quality: 3.8 )

Reviewer

Comments

Reviewer 1

Some of the graphics were visible, and the ones that were I liked--they were effective. With the subheadings, you say "social elevator 1," "Scholar 1" etc., but there is no 2 of that section, which is what I expected. The paper seems to praise what you consider "nerds" but that is not mentioned besides the intro and conclusion. The conclusion is witty, but not concrete withe the lack of thesis.

Reviewer 2

Author included subheadings to his/her pictures and writing. Some of the writing headings had Ò1Ó after it (e.g. ÒSocial Elevator 1Ó). The 3rd paragraphÕs indention was a bit off and too much to the right. One of the pictures intended to show up (placed in the beginning) did not show up and had a box with an X on it. Other than that, all the other pictures did show up. They were discussed in the essay. Some even provide a bit of comic relief. The author provides an introduction and conclusion with each paragraph dealing with one subject at a time. Introduction was okay, but I feel that it could have been more inviting. The conclusion ended in a stronger voice from the beginning. The footnotes were linked, but when I clicked on them, I was led to BloggerÕs Sign In page.

Reviewer 3

The organization was better than the focus in a sense that much of the essay was an exploration of Victorian versus modern college. I though that the essay had some good points that were intriguing. Specifically, I liked the direction the paper took in comparing women of the Victorian era with women of today. Moreover, I felt that outlining the advantages a modern student has with tutoring were solid.


However, I felt that paragraphs did not lead in any specif order. It was difficult to gauge the entire purpose of the paper. As a result, the organization suffered. The first paragraph opens with a brief comparison of Alice then jumps into a confusing second paragraph that has a loosely worded thesis. The organization then seems to come back together as the author follows a Victorian versus modern university approach. The essay then ends with a strong statement comparing the two eras.


Organization would be much improved by setting up this comparison in the first few paragraphs.

Reviewer 4

The first body paragraph is about Alice''s metaphor of college life.
The second paragraph is about the reality of college life--expectations and reality. It also includes the author''s interpretation of college.
The third paragraph is the difference between Victorian and contemporary college experiences. Social ladder vs. social ... social what? You explain that college IS all about being social in the Victorian era. You explain that people in college today act a certain way in order to lose their labels. Isn''t this what college was about in Victorian times? It was about being perceived a certain way.
You jump to the idea of finding happiness in others and the self.
The next paragraph goes into ideas of competition in colleges. Motivation for knowledge. You contradict yourself when saying earlier that college is a social ladder and now saying knowledge was for self gain.
The next paragraph you discuss resources. Earlier you discussed Alice, now you''re discussing Jude. You''ve made no connection between the two books.

There were no transitions between the sections. I saw no attempt at connecting ideas throughout the paper.

Flow (Overall quality: 4.0 )

Reviewer

Comments

Reviewer 1

The quotes from Newman and Jude are effective, but sometimes you have naked quotes that lack explanation and end paragraphs (7). The flow of the paper is good and at times I found myself laughing because it seemed very conversational. The language is clear and effective. The flow is your strongest section of the paper.

Reviewer 2

There is great flow within each sentence and paragraph. Writing is clear and direct, but seems to contain some passive voice. The author uses the parenthesis too many times and can do without them. The author missed some punctuation, which is shown through his/her need of commas.

Augustine Marcus: But sometimes, I donÕt want to tell people who I am[,] but instead[,] stay tucked away until IÕm different, or sometimes Òsomebody else[.]Ó.

The author had one run-on sentence:
Augustine Marcus: Sometimes this is good for the person, and their social skills increase, which allows them to be stronger people in the real world when they graduate, but sometimes this just pushes that person deeper into their vices until they are living on the street and begging for money, not living the life of prestige and wealth they could have gained by not partying all through school.

Reviewer 3

The author choose a humorous style that I enjoyed so I will give a little leeway in this area. Overall, the author has some good diction throughout. Specifically, the flow of the authors personal struggles in college with lifestyle and parents was very nice.


There were some issues with run on sentences and general sentence structure.


"We were raised to believe that we are entitled to a college education, but Jude dared to dream that it was possible and fought for it, yet failed miserably."


"But I would argue that Jude started out as the nerd who wanted to be happy with an education and books, but got distracted by the Òlusts of the fleshÓ, ÒIn short, as if materially, a compelling arm of extraordinary muscular power seized hold of himÉThisÉmoved him along, as a violent schoolmaster a schoolboy he has seized by the collar, in a direction which tended towards the embrace of a woman for who he had no respect and whose life had nothing in common with his own except localityÓ."


"Sometimes this is good for the person, and their social skills increase, which allows them to be stronger people in the real world when they graduate, but sometimes this just pushes that person deeper into their vices until they are living on the street and begging for money, not living the life of prestige and wealth they could have gained by not partying all through school. "


The above quotes represent great ideas that need to be reorganized. I see what the author is trying to do, and I like it, but I had to reread each paragraph due to sentence structure.


One of the things holding up the flow is the author not embedding quotes. They just hang there in spots:


"We decided in class that it was the goal of all Victorians (at least in Jude) to use other people to make them happy. But I would argue that Jude started out as the nerd who wanted to be happy with an education and books, but got distracted by the Òlusts of the fleshÓ, ÒIn short, as if materially, a compelling arm of extraordinary muscular power seized hold of himÉThisÉmoved him along, as a violent schoolmaster a schoolboy he has seized by the collar, in a direction which tended towards the embrace of a woman for who he had no respect and whose life had nothing in common with his own except localityÓ.

The quote above needs to be set up and integrated into the sentence.

Finally, I noticed several sentences beginning with "but, ...." I found this to stifle the flow.


Try to switch up sentence structure to improve the flow. For example, instead of typing: "But, ..." thrown it around a little bit. Try this: Jude, however, stated."

Reviewer 4

I had a problem with the paper because it was written with casual language. I understand that students are the audience of the papers, but the language was too casual for me. It was almost as if the paper was not proof read. There were run-on sentences, missing articles, and poorly used commas.

The word choice is also very strange. It''s not verbose, it''s awkward. "Some of us just need to stop and smell the bookbinding glue and be thankful that is such." What exactly does this mean? ''That is such'' is a poor choice of words.

 

Reviewer 5- Liana

1. FOCUS

The thesis of your paper is a little hard to define. I think it is that we need to realize the great opportunity in front of us that was not available in JudeÕs time. The socializing that you talk about is a little out of place. It is true that people come to UT because they donÕt know what else to do and so socialize but that is not what is necessarily great to the universities or them. I like that you focus on studies and how great they are and how many resources are in front of us. You talk about Jude getting lost in Òlusts of the fleshÓ but I do not think that is what stopped him. I think the same thing happens at UT and although it is easier to get an education it is also easier to get lost. I LOVE the second paragraph in which you compare Alice to college life. Each comparison of a character to life nowadays is funny and entertaining. I would like to see that more throughout your paper. Maybe if you could separate those ideas in the paragraph and connect them to the rest of the paper. Or that could be a good introduction and then you could include more examples from Alice into your paragraphs.

2. ORGANIZATION

Your ideas are well organized make sense where they are placed. I think it would be great if you could include an intro sentence in each paragraph and relate that to your thesis or to Alice. You talk about oxford being stuffy and boring in the conclusion but I think thatÕs kind of out of place. When you say ÒJude dared to dream of a college educationÓ it doesnÕt really go along with the rest of the paragraph.

3. FLOW

The paper flows pretty well and it is easy to go from one paragraph to the next. I think a better conclusion deducting something from all that you said would really help it. And some of the pics didnÕt show up which you probably know.

Again, I would really like to see you incorporate Aliceland into universityland because I thought you had a really great idea there in the beginning and you could leave your paragraphs as they are but include an introduction of how it relates to Alice. Good luck! Ooh..and add a title.