Creativity 101 (9.15.2005)
Do
I think for myself? I have honestly sat
here for about 30 minutes asking myself this question. Is it possible to know if we think for
ourselves? Do we even have free
will? I’m not sure of what I think, but
the possibility that free thought is impossible to achieve is certainly worth
considering and discussing. Our
reasoning is undeniable based on outside forces. No one lives in a vacuum without other people
or possible impacts to consider. These
determinants shape thought. For example,
the atmosphere in which one grows up, such as being raised with narration and
character stories, shapes the way one thinks.
Regardless of what framework one is raised in, there is no way of
telling if we make our own choices or not because the costs and benefits of
actions and outcomes are going to be shaded by our experiences and varying
perceptions. Perhaps these early
experiences shape our conscious mind which invariably shapes our
decisions. Natalie Goldberg’s analogy of
the conscious mind as a dot made me think about my separation of unconscious
and conscious thoughts. She explains,
“The
blue sky is wild mind. I’m going to
climb up to that sky straight over our heads and put one dot on it with a Magic
Marker. See that dot? That dot is what Zen calls monkey mind of
what western psychology calls part of conscious mind. We give all our attention to that one dot. So when it says we can’t write, that we’re no
good, are failures, fools for even picking up a pen, we listen to it”
(180).
If outside forces
have shaped the dot that affects our choices, is it possible to think for
ourselves? Even if forces from our
childhood don’t shape our decisions, are we even able to separate ourselves
from our current situations? By trying
to think independently, do we really tune out the opinions and atmosphere that
surround us? Can we really tune out the
opinions and atmosphere that surround us?
In
this reading, I also found the discussion of nature interesting. Burch recognizes that
“…nature
is always composed within a specific frame of motives and expectations. Each human group develops its special
collection of motives which designate the appropriate and inappropriate forms
of conduct in regard to other men, other groups, and the nonhuman environment,
and these selective perceptions determine whether the nonhuman environment will
become a resource, a taboo, or remain unseen” (189).
I think the concept
of socialization is interesting. If we
weren’t socialized like we are, would the world seem like complete chaos? Or is there some common thread that binds different
forms of human socialization together?
While
this entry isn’t completely reactionary or personal, I believe these are
interesting questions worth discussing.