September 25, 2006
Downtown
"When
I wrote the following pages, or rather the bulk of them, I lived alone, in the
woods, a mile from any neighbor, in a house which I had built myself, on the shore of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts, and earned my living by the labor
of my hands only. I lived there two years and two months. At present I am a
sojourner in civilized life again."
So begins Henry David Thoreau's Walden, or Life in the Woods, who devoted 26
months of his life in utter solitude in order to remove himself from
civilization. During his journey to realization, his removal from any form of
human interaction was essential to his larger question; ¿He wanted to find out
what was life -- what is absolutely necessary in life and what is
superfluous," says Thomas Blanding, who studied and restored Thoreau¿s
journals. Thoreau¿s pilgrammage represents a drastic version of what humans
struggle with on a daily basis: self-realization and one¿s place in the world.
To many, nature represents an escape from problems, complexities, issues¿a
break from life, essentially. In contrast, city life is a chaotic pandemonium
characterized by a constant pressure to do and go, especially seen in America, where the lifestyle is often
personified by a constant level of stress. The city is also connotative of ¿a
chaos of intentions¿a jumble of eras and architectures that only a distant view
of the skyline or a lens like Central Park can harmonize,¿ (Klinkenborg, Bump,
721). However, the city is also the home of a great majority of America¿s
population, where home, work, and all other aspects of life are within a
comfortable driving distance of one another. It is the only world many know. So
the question is, live like our ancestors with Mother Earth or accelerate with
the times into city life? And yet, Frank Lloyd Wright, one of the most
prominent and influential architects of the 20th century, merged his two
worlds-natural and professional-noting that, ¿Nature is my manifestation of
God. I go to nature every day for inspiration in the day¿s work. I follow in
building the principles which nature has used in its domain¿ ().
Perhaps, Wright has realized one of the key dogmas to leading a successful
life: balance. Even an architect, who typically represents he who is most
removed from nature, is able to integrate two seemingly contradicting aspects
of life. Wright is also an example of how architecture can lend itself to this
balance. Just because architecture is typically associated with city life does
not mean that it cannot have its source in nature, as Wright has illustrated.
From Prehistoric Indians who ¿capitalized on what nature had provided¿ to the
Victorian Period which emphasized structure and ornamentation from the actual
materials, to Gothic architecture whose very design emulates nature,
architecture, and subsequently cities, are inevitable linked to nature (Bump,
469). In fact, every aspect of human society is built upon a foundation of
nature, from our shelters, to our diets, to recreation, to a source of comfort
and solitude necessary to balance the hectic day. Instead of pitting one
against the other, nature and cities can harmonize one another, complementing
the other to enrich human life, as long as humans do not encroach upon Mother
Nature¿s bounty, without replenishing it. For most people, each locale
represents differing aspects of the human persona, and are
thus, both necessary for the ultimate source of happiness: balance.


