Amanda Jones

 

Community: the College Experience

 

            The University of Texas at Austin boasts a proud heritage as well as a promising future; the goals of this university include learning from and celebrating its distinguished past and preparing its students to become leaders of tomorrow.   A master plan should further these goals for the campus, and yet, with fifty-thousand plus students, there are a lot of logistical requirements that also need to be met.  In constructing a model to fulfill all these needs, form must follow function.  This does not mean that all buildings should be constructed purely for utility; rather, the master plan should seek to construct buildings that maximize spatial effectiveness (or the desired impact of a space on its occupants), elevating the buildings’ functions to “the cultivation of the intellect,” which, according to one of the university’s former presidents, should be the “central mission of any and all universities.”[1]  To accomplish this worthy goal, I propose to permanently adopt an architectural style that fulfills the needs of functionality, awareness of heritage, and aesthetic variety: the Beaux-Arts style, with an emphasis on Spanish Renaissance.

 

            The Beaux-Arts style, a term covering a wide range of architectural forms, can be translated as ‘Fine Arts,’ which accurately represents its emphasis on classics and artistic beauty in buildings.  This style adds an eclectic flair to the late Neoclassical movement while still drawing inspiration from Romanesque and Renaissance styles.  Paul Cret’s Spanish Renaissance style can actually be categorized as a sort of subset within Beaux-Arts, the school of architecture he studied.  So buildings on campus under this master plan will include not only the Spanish-themed structures already in place, but also new buildings that fall under the more general Beaux-Arts category while retaining some key elements, which I will detail later.  Some of the only characteristic attributes that define this broad style include symmetry, spatial hierarchy, grandiosity, and detailed ornamentation.[2]  The photo to Text Box: Figure 1- Palais Garnier in Paris, Francethe left shows Palais Garnier in Paris, an example of the mixture of classical styles that is characteristic of the Beaux-Arts school.

 

            As suggested by its alternative name, Academic Classicism, the Beaux-Arts style functions well on college campuses.  The size and grandiosity of buildings in this style match the physical needs of such a populous university without sacrificing aesthetic elements.  Unlike Gothic, which tends to be “uncomfortable, ornate and pretentious,”[3] or Modernism, which embodies the impersonal and breaks away from all historical aesthetics, Beaux-Arts buildings are “user-friendly” as well as pleasing to the eye.[4]  This style will allow construction of capacious buildings to accommodate the immense student population while also functioning to create a cohesive, academic, and aesthetically pleasing environment.

 

            Architecture can also support UT’s goal to be “a community striving to preserve its past…while building a bold, exciting and dynamic future.”[5]  What better architectural style is there than one that draws on so many of the past cultures and time periods that make up our heritage?  Even the influence of the Gothic style so common on ivy-league campuses can be seen and utilized in the Beaux-Arts through its usually detailed decorations.  The historical exteriors of Beaux-Arts buildings exude the wisdom and strength gleaned from our past.  Many of the existing Beaux-Arts buildings on campus provide tangible examples: the Main Building, covered with symbols of antiquity and forever reminding all who pass its walls that ‘the truth shall make Text Box: Figure 2 - Inscription on UT Toweryou free’ (partly shown in the above picture), and the Will C. Hogg Building, exhibiting “a frieze reproducing in stone the animals of prehistoric times, the fossils they have left, the crystals and ores of minerals” on its walls.[6]

 

            These links to our past are vital to producing a university community that appreciates the unique traditions and heritage of Texas, and since the Spanish Renaissance style represents an especially significant part of our heritage (as well as provides practical benefits with its use of pitched roofs and overhangs to create shade), it makes sense that the Beaux-Arts buildings retain a decidedly Spanish flavor.  This will also eliminate the need for building an entirely new campus, since many of the original Cret buildings exhibit this style cohesively.  This retention of key buildings and styles is of crucial importance to the identity of the campus; after all, who could bear to see the University of Texas without its trademark clock tower or other buildings like it?  The clock tower “symbolizes the University” in thought, on paper, and in the media to Text Box: Figure 3 - UT Tower in Austin skylinealumni, students, and corporations all around the world.[7]  The photo on the left shows a well-known image of the clock tower on the Austin skyline.

 

            In the same way that we must be careful not to destroy cohesive elements that contribute to the core of the university’s identity, we must also be careful to encourage sufficient variety to stimulate the senses, uniquely identify each building, and cater to the differing tastes of a diverse student population.  This must be done, however, without creating “a series of disparate pieces.”[8]  The Beaux-Arts style includes a large palette of previous styles to draw upon for diversity.  Beaux-Arts buildings may be as ornate and grandiose as the Pennsylvania Railway Station in New York (shown on the top right) or as simple as a water pumping station in Massachusetts (shown on the left).  Buildings to house large lecture halls, residential dorms, and small classrooms can all be tailor-made under this large umbrella of the Text Box: Figure 5 - Pennsylvania Railway StationBeaux-Arts style without seeming out of place or character.  With so many historical traditions and forms to draw from, the possibilities are endless.  Creativity will be encouraged, but not to the point where Text Box: Figure 4 - water pumping station in Massachusettsa building clashes with or ignores the surrounding campus structures.

 

            Above all, cohesiveness should be apparent throughout campus, contributing to a larger sense of purpose and identity for the university and establishing “the sinews of community among our students, faculty, and staff.”[9]  The original Cret buildings on the Forty Acres can be used as touchstones when designing new facilities, however classifying them as purely Spanish-Renaissance and using only that style can lead to second-rate buildings.  If the only requirements for new buildings are red tile roofs, brownish bricks, and overhangs, then even Jester passes inspection; but where is the tradition in Jester?  Where is the beauty?  Where is the awe-inspiring feeling that you get walking down the halls of Harvard or Oxford?  It does not—it can not— exist in Jester in its present state.  So while certain characteristics of the Spanish Renaissance style should remain to unite each individual building into a campus, the broad Beaux-Arts style should be viewed as the general guideline in fashioning diverse buildings.  Each structure will tell an inspirational story, steeped in traditional symbols and teeming with details designed to awaken curiosity and celebrate the wealth of knowledge found within its walls.  The Main Building epitomizes this.  Not only does it tower above every building on campus (becoming a guiding light to all students in a physical sense, but also in a symbolic sense), it also boasts an awe-inspiring record of western-civilization’s entire evolution: names of philosophers and authors ranging from Homer to Twain are inscribed underneath the windows, famous universities are listed around the cornices, alphabets of languages that led to the origin of English are patterns on the tower’s faces, quotes regarding knowledge and Texas history line the insides of the Regents’ Room inside….and the list goes on.  When an outsider sees the Tower they see more than a building; they see the proud history of our civilization, our state, and our university.  Every building on campus should so well represent who we are here at the University of Texas, and the Beaux-Arts style can pave the way.

            Classical elements such as columns and arches will be required, as well as an emphasis on unique details for each building.  Spanish-Renaissance characteristics that should remain include pitched roofs of red or brown tile, limestone and gold or orange brick bases, and use of iron or bronze.  Light-colored glass is also encouraged.  It should not account for a majority of the exterior on any building, however all buildings need to have enough windows to create bright and open interiors that, in turn, will facilitate bright and open minds.

The Main building and other buildings that already fit these criteria should remain on campus; however structures such as the communications buildings, the engineering buildings, Jester Center, and the business school need to be re-designed to fit within the master plan.  These out-of-place structures were designed with little regard to aesthetic quality or the spatial effectiveness favored by Paul Cret in his original master plan.  This has not gone unnoticed by students, one of whom describes the communication building as “a box of nothing.”  The communication and engineering buildings (shown on the left in relation to a model of the Tower in SL, and on the right, respectively) do not look like they belong on the UT campus; they share little to no characteristics with the Beaux-Arts buildings on the original Forty Acres.  A visitor should be able to tell exactly when they have walked off campus simply by the change in architectural style of the buildings they pass by.  As of now, a visitor could easily think that they had gotten lost and wandered into a corporate structure (and a boring one, at that!).  These buildings are perfect examples of choosing short-term savings over a long-term reputation for a first class campus – a habit that could prove detrimental to the high standards of the University of Texas.

                    

Figure 6 - UT Communications and Engineering Buildings

 

            An additional element of this plan re-establishes the north-south and east-west axes of the original Forty Acres as the basis for future construction of buildings and outdoor areas.  To facilitate community interaction and relaxation, buildings will be arranged around plazas and courtyards, such as those already found in the Honors Quad and between the liberal arts buildings on the South Mall.  Statues and fountains will be encouraged as key pieces of historical value on campus; however, they should be built from cast iron or bronze in order to remain similar in appearance.  I choose iron and bronze because they match well with the limestone and gold brick materials of the buildings, and many of the statues Text Box: Figure 8 - Littlefield Fountainalready on campus or near it demonstrate this, such as the Littlefield Fountain and the star outside the Texas State History Museum.

Text Box: Figure 7b – Replica of Bronze Star outside Texas State History Museum

 

            Interior design of buildings should also strive to create ‘courtyard-like’ spaces on a north-south and east-west axis as much as possible.  Communal areas in central locations with plenty of seating will act as focal points for future structures, along with alcoves for individual or small-group collaboration and comfort.  These will facilitate learning from other students as well as their professors, so that the students and faculty are not “disparate pieces,” but rather a cohesive whole much like the buildings themselves.[10]  Too long has quality been sacrificed for utility and price in the structure of buildings.  Each structure should represent Jefferson’s ‘academic village,’ encouraging student cooperation and activity on the university campus.  We do not want this university to become a purely commuter-like school where students come for classes and tests only; we want the student body to grow and thrive on campus all hours of the day because much of learning takes place outside of the classroom setting.  Quality buildings that facilitate this may be economically disadvantageous, but the induced quality of student life and experience is well worth the cost.

 

            With all of these combined elements, the university campus will better embody “a collection of ideal villages whose physical environment is central to and supportive of learning.”[11]  Buildings constructed in the Beaux-Arts style will contribute to the identity and mission of the campus by creating a cohesive physical environment that celebrates the university’s heritage and traditions while providing the versatility and practicality necessary to equip students and staff with skills for the future.  Re-emphasis on spatial awareness for buildings and open spaces will contribute to an atmosphere that is conducive to community collaboration as well as aesthetically pleasing.  Statues and fountains will contribute to the awareness of heritage while remaining consistent with the buildings surrounding them.  Interiors will strive to reflect the same general emphasis on communal and aesthetic principles wherever possible.  Overall, this master plan will establish the University of Texas at Austin as a community in all aspects: physically, intellectually, and socially.  We cannot expect to change the world until we have first changed ourselves—and not just by memorizing facts, but by becoming a part of something bigger than each individual.  The University of Texas can be that ‘something bigger’ for the students who pass through its walls, but only if those who direct it are intentional about creating a place that inspires and nurtures.  With this responsibility in mind, a university becomes much more than a place to receive an education in the most literal sense of the word – it becomes “part of our experience, part of who we are and how we define ourselves” – and that is what the ‘college experience’ should be all about.[12] 

 

Word count: 2,045

Location of SL project: Middle of the far North edge of the campus map (front side of the tower)


Notes



[1] Peter Flawn, “Annual Address to the Faculty, 1984,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 306-307, p. 306.

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaux-Arts_architecture

[3] Grace Glueck, “In Pointed Style: The Gothic Revival in America, 1800-1860,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 519-522, p. 520.

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaux-Arts_architecture

[5] Robert Berdahl, “Regaining a Sense of Community,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 411-412, p. 412.

[6] Margaret Berry, Brick by Golden Brick, in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 358-404A, p. 379.

[7] Margaret Berry, Brick by Golden Brick, Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 358-404A, p. 385.

[8] “The American Campus Ideal – the Academic Village,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 413-414, p. 413.

[9] Robert Berdahl, “Regaining a Sense of Community,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 411-412, p. 411.

[10] “The American Campus Ideal – the Academic Village,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 413-414, p. 413.

[11] “The American Campus Ideal – the Academic Village,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 413-414, p. 413.

[12] Robert Berdahl, “Regaining a Sense of Community,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. by Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 411-412, p. 412.

 

List of Illustrations

Figure 1 – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaux-Arts_architecture

Figure 2 – http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/christiansoncampus/main.html

Figure 3 – http://www.gohorns.com/flashback-2005.html

Figure 4 – http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/beauxarts.html

Figure 5 – http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/beauxarts.html

Figure 6 – SecondLife

Figure 7 – http://www.utexas.edu/inside_ut/postcards/

Figure 7b – SecondLife