The Floating Box and Beyond:
Le Corbusier’s Modernism as my Ideal Campus Master Plan

By Elizabeth Wong

 

The dramatic planes of the building, pure and white, rise out above the ground like a floating castle. Underneath the raised building, there is well-manicured landscaping tucked around a leisurely pedestrian walkway. Suddenly, students come down the long outdoor staircase in a flood; some chatting happily, others moving determinedly towards their next class. Upstairs in the building, a professor slides open a wall of glass, and his students file out to the rooftop terrace to hold class under the open sky. In the other classrooms, the warm natural light of the sun filters in through large windows, lighting the professor and students. These images are from my ideal campus, inspired by the sleek and daring buildings of Le Corbusier. When my campus master plan is accepted, the University of Texas at Austin will be transformed into the modern and cutting-edge campus that its unique spirit and dedication to leadership deserves.

            The campus is the outward face of the University, the first thing the public sees, so our master plan should present buildings that share traits with our university: dignified, while still being modern and forward-thinking. The great architect Le Corbusier's style fits our University perfectly; it is beautiful in both its apparent simplicity and its functionality. The primary focus of our University is to promote learning. Towards this end, Modernistic buildings present a special opportunity to experience a learning atmosphere as never before.

            For the purpose of illustrating my ideas, I have created a virtual campus in the 3D game of Second Life. Images from this virtual campus as scattered throughout the paper. My goal in doing this was to illustrate all of my points very literally. By showing a screenshot of exactly what I am talking about, I hope to reinforce my points and give a clear sense of my vision. The virtual buildings give viewers a feel for the functionality and the sense of place present in my campus master plan.

It seems logical that, “good architects begin by asking who will use a building and what they will use it for.”[1] Though this is not always the case, it will be in my campus. The buildings that will compose my new campus will first and foremost serve the people who will use them: the students. The university grounds will become an academic environment, its own microcosm of learning. Modernist buildings allow incredible ease in planning and exhibit great functionality. Though not all of the buildings on campus will be the “floating box” style traditionally associated with Corbusier, many of them will. The modern style of building is especially conducive to classrooms, laboratories, and lecture halls as it allows for relative freedom in planning the rooms – without thought of a complicated Gothic façade. The shape of the building will result “from the activities performed inside,”[2] allowing function to supersede design. Though educational buildings work well with the “floating box,” auditoriums, churches, and museum spaces could be realized in the spiritual and curving heights of Corbusier’s Philips Pavilion, seen above, or his Church of Notre-Dame-du-Haut, right.  These buildings were designed not to glorify man and his activities, but to “unite men with the cosmos,”[3] and are fitting for places of worship or fine arts on campus.

            One aspect of my master plan that sets it apart from any other plan is its subtle reflection of nature. Corbusier listed an integral “Cinq Points” of his architecture that will be reflected in all academic buildings in my master plan. These were:

the use of pilotis as structural elements, lifting the building and leaving a space under it; columnar-and-slab construction enabling floor plans to be left as free and adaptable as possible, partitions (if required) not being structural; the creation of a roof-garden at the top, affording better light and air than on the ground; the mode of construction facilitating long continuous strips of windows; and complete freedom of façade-design.[4]

These five elements each reflect a unique harmony with nature and should be displayed in every building on the new UT campus, with the exception of the aforementioned fine arts and religious buildings. The pilotis lifting up the bulk of the building are reminiscent of tree trunks, holding up their heavy foliage, leaving shade and space underneath for others to enjoy. The roof-garden at the top would allow for studying and class discussions under the open sky, or even science experiments and art classes. This garden can be seen illustrated in my virtual campus, Image D, or in Corbusier’s Villa Savoye, Image E. Most importantly, the long windows wrapping around the building and open-air atriums would allow natural light to penetrate into each classroom and even the center of the building, a much better option than fluorescent lighting. In Image F, from my virtual campus, a student stands in a classroom, looking through the long windows at the campus around her. As you can see in the image below right, Corbusier’s style left buildings open to natural light from all angles. Even in the arts buildings that are in not the “floating box” style, natural light will remain the most important feature. Le Corbusier himself defined architecture as “the masterly, correct and magnificent play of volumes brought together in light,”[5] and the buildings on our campus would be just that, with an abundance of light as their unifying and central feature.

                           

Another facet of Le Corbusier’s buildings inspired by nature is the use of the Golden Ratio to determine the proportions of a building. The Golden Ratio, roughly defined as 1.618, is found frequently in nature and life in many varied forms: in the proportions of the human body, as seen in Da Vinci’s “Vitruvian Man”; in the length of sides of a pentagram; to the size of a modern credit card. It is characterized by a rectangle whose long side is 1.618 times the length of the shorter side; this ratio is traditionally thought to be aesthetically pleasing, inspiring works of art and mathematics from the Renaissance to the present. Because this ratio is found in nature and the human body, it is a subtle and academic way to reflect nature in a building that is, at first glance, not very natural at all. In Image A, you can see that I constructed the building on the left to form a perfect Golden Rectangle. This also echoes Robert Berdahl’s master plan for campus buildings that use “a visual language that has its roots in the human proportion of feet, body, and head,”[6] though perhaps not in the exact way he intended it. The use of this mathematical concept gives the buildings a feeling of natural balance in their shapes of right angles and straight lines.

            My campus master plan will contribute radically to the University by creating a truly pedestrian campus. The buildings raised on pilotis will allow for paths and walkways underneath them. In the image to the right, you can see the space under my virtual building where walkways are placed, linking the two buildings. This lends the campus convenience, making it much easier to travel between one building and the next without having to walk around buildings. The areas under the buildings will be landscaped to include ponds and flowers, and benches will be installed to make the pedestrian walkways more pleasant for the busy students of the university. Driving roads will be pushed to the outside edges of the campus, so that students will be free to walk around campus without fear of vehicular interference. Faculty parking, however, could be conveniently located right underneath some of the outside buildings that are less often used. The raised buildings also emulate porches, by providing shade from the intense Texas sun. This is another wonderful example of the functionality of Corbusier’s buildings in action. Not only will students have more landscaped pathways for walking and relaxing, they will also be shaded from the sun on much of their walk.

            This master plan also adds to the university by creating an academic atmosphere with its clean look and design. Corbusier’s buildings have a beautifully pure and calming quality that will aid in the students’ inner peace. When he designed them, they sought a “return to order undertaken during the war;” they utilized “a purified, refined language, like that of the Cubists.”[7] Indeed, his buildings do have a purist quality about them that will prove advantageous to the scholastic environment of our campus. The white walls will aid in concentration during class, emitting a sense of peace and clear-headedness. An occasional surprising splash of color will catch the eye of work-weary students, helping to relieve the tension of a long day. This is seen in the red ramp uniting the floors of my virtual building, Image I. The graceful curve of a spiral staircase indoors, like the one in Image J, is a surprising contrast to the right angles of the buildings, and is almost sculptural in its effect, providing another element of beauty to refresh the mind of the student.

The elegant right angles and pleasing proportions of Corbusier’s modern buildings elicit feelings of serenity, which are fitting to a university dedicated to becoming “a place where young people prepare themselves intellectually and socially to enter the world.”[8] Though the campus life a student enters is seldom serene, the beautiful and calm buildings around them will help them to focus on thought and learning. My master plan creates a clear sense of a “campus” with a common idea governing all of the buildings. This “common theme” does not mean that all of the buildings on campus are to follow the floating box style, nor are curves and spirals to be abolished. The buildings will simply be true to Corbusier’s spirit and style, and the majority will exemplify his traditional cinq points. The architecture will represent a progression from the past, but not a total break from it. Elements of historical architecture will always be present in the use of space, and even in the representation of Ruskin’s traditional elements of Gothic architecture: modern buildings routinely illustrate redundancy, as in the repeated pilotis or the bands of black and white around a building; love of nature, as seen in their subtle reflection of the world around us; and “the tendency to delight in fantastic and ludicrous, as well as in sublime, images,” as seen primarily in the sweeping, sublime heights of the Philip’s Pavilion and similar buildings.[9] Le Corbusier revered and appreciated the past, but found it was time for him to create a new style of building for our generation. Corbusier himself was averse to the melding of styles that is commonplace today. Late in his life, he “would refer to the ‘lesson of Rome’ and rail against” the architects who “distorted” great architecture and “rendered it sterile.”[10] Not wanting to cheapen or destroy the past he so revered, Corbusier instead created an entirely new style. Modernism represents a development away from the past and into the future.

            This master plan contains many elements which will benefit the University of Texas at Austin as a whole. It makes use of practical design by eliminating the restriction of a classic façade and maintains a clear connection to nature, mimicking its surroundings in subtle and creative ways. The plan provides a clearly defined “campus” atmosphere by creating a pedestrian-centric layout and providing classrooms with natural light and white walls to aid in concentration. Our campus will reflect UT’s position as a leading university in its inventive and modern buildings. The University of Texas at Austin is a forward-minded, innovative community dedicated to learning, and it deserves a campus master plan that embodies its spirit. Our University has one goal: to educate its young students who will go out and change the world. By accepting this master plan, the Board of Regents will display their commitment to our great University and its future by creating a new campus that is innovative, beautiful, and functional.

 

 

 

1809 words without quotes

(After deleting at least 90 from the previous draft)

My SL project is FINISHED and can be found in second life in the corner behind the tower, next to the sign reading “Liz Wong’s Ideal Campus.”

 

 

 

Images

 

A, D, F, H, and I:

Image from Second Life, created by Elizabeth Wong.

 

B:

Image from http://www.lib.umd.edu/ARCH/exhibition/galleries/1958bru/philips2.html.

 

C:

Image from http://www.nga.gov/education/classroom/new_angles/img/img_corbusier2_lg.jpg.

 

E, G, and J:

Cohen, Jean-Louis. Le Corbusier, 1887-1965: The Lyricism of Architecture in the Machine Age. Germany: Taschen, 2004.

 

K:

Image from http://www.austinmuseums.org/images/members/harry_1.jpg.

 



[1] Lester Faigley, The Little Penguin Handbook (Austin: U of Texas P, 2007), 13.

[2] André Wogenscky, Le Corbusier’s Hands (Cambridge: MIT P, 2006), 46.

[3] Jean-Louis Cohen. Le Corbusier, 1887-1965: The Lyricism of Architecture in the Machine Age (Germany: Taschen, 2004), 65.

[4] James Stevens Curl, “Le Corbusier,” Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, 2006, http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t1.e1169.

[5] Cohen, 1.

[6] Robert Berdahl, “The University of Texas at Austin Campus Master Plan,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature Vol. I, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 418.

[7] Cohen, 10.

[8] “What Makes Us Unique,” University of Texas at Austin Website, 2006, http://www.utexas.edu/opa/utbrand/unique.html.

[9] John Ruskin, “The Nature of Gothic,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature Vol. II, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: Jenn’s, 2006), 552.

[10] Cohen, 8.