A
Connection to Nature
By Megan Gilbert
A successful university should be one that produces not
only individuals with quality educations, but individuals with great
characters. Students should be moved to desire more knowledge, to do good in
the world, and to strive to make their lives meaningful. In order to accomplish
this, a university must create a connection between the environment of its
campus and the architecture of its buildings. The Latin term “Genius loci”1
refers to this connection and the “special magic”2 it creates.
The relationship between nature and the created amplifies the impact an
institution has on an individual. The campus plan should have a spirit of unity
and togetherness, because unified buildings work together for a common goal -- to
bring enlightenment to every student who steps foot on this campus. In order to
accomplish this goal, as Faulkner states, we must “design every element in a
way that serves our architectural heritage [and] the adjacent environments.”3
Therefore, I suggest a campus plan that uses Spanish architecture as its
foundation and combines it with details of other architectural styles.
Spanish architecture does “serve our architectural
heritage.”4 The red roofs give the impression of clay, resembling
the adobe houses of the old southwest. This resemblance creates a connection to
the land as well as a connection to the past. Spanish architecture reflects

A Spanish Style
Hacienda5 An Example of Spanish
Architecture in California6
Although Spanish architecture should be the basis of
the campus, each building should have diverse architectural details. Some
buildings will have Gothic details while others will have Baroque. Diversity is
necessary to ensure that each student on campus is able to identify with a specific
structure. When every person connects to a building, all the students become
linked together “through a shared sense of commitment,”7 which
creates a community of learning and growth which all students become a part of.
The details of the buildings should be of all types of architecture and create uniqueness
among the building. A visible example of detail variety is Battle Hall.
Although it retains the main features of Spanish architecture, the building
possesses Gothic features as well. The lamps that grace the entry way are made
of green-blue iron and contain many blunt and jutting features, similar to the
turrets and harsh details inherent to Gothic buildings. The railings that line
the windows are prefect examples of Gothic repetition. These details on Battle
Hall give it a unique identity, while the main features establish unity with
the surrounding buildings.

Battle Hall and its Blue Iron Gothic
Features8
The rich ornamentation of Sutton Hall provides
another example of diversity coexisting with unity. The rounded arches give way
to vaulted ceilings that are elaborately decorated with maidens, dragons, and
natural figures. The underside of the roof possesses elaborate decoration as
well. The patterns are a mixture of deep, rich wood, earthy sage components,
and clay red accents. With its vast array of details, this building could be
said to have Plateresque, Gothic, and Baroque features. The women portrayed in
the ceilings are distinctly Baroque and just inches from them sit distinctly
Gothic dragons. The underside of the
roof and the vaulted arches are a “riot of colors and forms.”9 This style of building will appeal to the more
right-brained students on campus, while a less embellished, more practically
structured building will appeal to the more left-brained students. 10

Sutton Hall Vault11 Sutton Hall Roof Corner12
Not only should the details be diverse, but they
should reflect what students are learning on the inside of the buildings. The
form of the structures should follow their functions. Less ornamented buildings
should be found in the engineering and math sector of campus. The crisp lines
and angles of the buildings reflect the left side of the brain, the side that
dominates these areas of study. The liberal arts and fine arts sector should be
the most ornately embellished. The ornamentation appeals to the right side of
the brain, the side that dominates these areas of study. If the diversity that
is created in the details of each building is maximized, then the campus will
be able to affect all of its students.
A crucial element of the campus is a building that helps
students maneuver about campus on a day-to-day basis. A tower, easily seen,
like that of the Main Building on campus, will guide students to and from
classes. Just as the North Star helped seafarers navigate the waters of the
oceans, a tower is needed to help students navigate on campus. The tower will
be a beacon of light for those who are lost physically and academically,
representing the light of truth the university is spreading over the world.
Therefore, I propose that the tower and most of the Forty Acres be kept.
Buildings that stray from the Spanish style, such as Jester, the Robert L.
Moore building, and the engineering complex, should be removed and replaced.
Aspects of other buildings, such as the

Windows of the Harry Ransom Center13
Architecture is not only about the buildings
themselves, but the environment that surrounds them. The current layout of the
university contains too many twists and turns. An ideal layout would be one
that includes a central building, the tower, and paths branching from it. Each
path will represent a certain broad field of study such as business, science,
or liberal and fine arts. Each path should be an elongated circle, making room
for a courtyard or lawn in the middle. Thus, from the air, the campus would
resemble a flower. This provides students with a campus that is easy to
maneuver and rich in lawns, similar to the lawn found in the six pack. The
presence of these large natural elements is necessary to create the connection
between the buildings and the environment.
Flower Campus Model14

In order for the connection between nature and the
created to be established, the environment on campus must be that of the
environment of

View of Second Life Campus16
Above is a picture of my model campus that I created
in Second Life. Here, I am attempting to present a visual model of all the key
points of my campus plan. My virtual campus is an endeavor to bring the flower
campus layout to life and to help the reader visualize how unity and diversity
can coexist. I wanted the images on each of the Second Life structures to be of
familiar buildings so they were readily identified by the reader, so I chose
buildings that already exist on the

Tower at
A problem I encountered in Second Life was the
inability to completely represent my ideal campus. Due to lack of space, I was
unable to shown how each “petal” would be lined with buildings and how each
petal would fit next to its neighboring petal. My model is a simplified version
of campus and only contains a main building and four peripheral buildings. As I
proposed, the tower and main building are present in the center of campus to
function as a guide for students on campus. From the air, my Second Life campus
resembles a star more than a flower. However, while the shapes of the lawns in
Second Life are different, the basic principle is still the same. Present in
each “petal” or “point” are the lawns on which students can gather and gain a
sense of community.
Another problem I encountered in Second Life was the
inability to create a visual representation of the natural space on campus. I
was unable to line the walk ways with trees and shrubs, as seen below in the
landscaping of the six pack. The sense of space that is created by the natural
world is extremely important in the development of the “Genius loci” 19
of the university. Nature, the ties it has with campus buildings, and the
resulting sense of community are the cornerstones of my campus, and Second
Life’s inability to portray this environment leads to the virtual campus’
inability to completely and accurately represent my master plan.

Landscaping of the Six Pack20
1. Larry R. Faulkner, “Message from Larry R. Faulkner, 27th
President of the University of Texas,” in Composition
and Reading in World Literature Course Packet Volume I, ed. Jerome Bump
(Austin, Texas: Jenn’s Copy & Binding, 2006), 410.
2. Faulkner, 410.
3. Faulkner, 410.
4. Faulkner, 410.
5. Image from www.haciendasiestaalegre.com
6. Image from www.andysnow.com
7. Robert M. Berdahl, “Regaining a Sense of Community,” in Composition and Reading in World Literature
Course Packet Volume I, ed. Jerome Bump (
8. Image from
http://www.utexas.edu/maps/main/buildings/btl.html
9. Jeanne Claire van
Ryzin, “Modern Wonders,” in Composition
and Reading in World Literature Course Packet Volume II, ed. Jerome Bump
(Austin, Texas: Jenn’s Copy & Binding, 2006), 580.
10. Prianka Singapura, Discussion Board, October 11, 2006.
11. Image from
http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~bump/images/arch/Sutton/
12. Image from http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~bump/images/arch/Sutton/
13. Image by Megan Gilbert
14. Image by Megan Gilbert
15. Faulkner, 410.
16. Image by Megan Gilbert
17. Image by Megan Gilbert
18. Image by Megan Gilbert
19. Faulkner, 410.
20. Images by Megan Gilbert