Learning to be a leader who lives from a solid foundation of self-awareness is the greatest benefit I can receive from my liberal university education. The accelerating evolution of society and culture in the modern world demands that liberal education evolve as well. New and innovative techniques are emerging to teach leadership, which increasingly entails a wide variety of skills, such as finding balance between emotional and interpersonal intelligences and communicating through multimedia technologies like Second Life. I strive to become a self-aware leader who lives a compassionate, balanced life, and who inspires growth in both personal relationships and the global society. By exploring my role model Ken WilberÕs life and teachings, I have been inspired to explore myself, which has helped me to realize these goals. From the previous role model assignments, I have learned that emulating a role model can be impetus for self-development; that our experiment with Second Life was valuable, though not effective as leadership training; and that balance is integral to both multimedia writing and my personal vision.

Through writing about my role model in P1, the first of this series of essays, I learned about the type of leader I want to become. I revisited Ken WilberÕs work and life story, which have been major inspirations for the direction I have taken during the past year or so of my life. During his twenties, Wilber began writing extensively and published several books of scholarly acclaim. He read everything from biochemistry and social theory, to Emerson and Lao Tzu, to enlightenment philosophy and Gestalt psychology, to mythology and medieval transcendentalists. When he is researching for a book he tries Òto go through two to four books a dayÉ. When IÕm writingÉ I work at a very intense paceÉ. IÕll sometimes put in fifteen-hour days. I read hundreds of books during the year, and a book forms in my head – I write the book in my head.Ó[1]  He has garnered immense respect for his theoretical writing and research, yet his teachings are inspired by more than a global bookcase. 



I have benefited from his intellectual work, but his approach to living has revolutionized my life. Being a true leader entails that one not be satisfied with mere ideas, and indeed Wilber is not. His academic achievements are the residue of his true pursuit – Òself-awarenessÉ the foundation for the rest.Ó[2]  Wilber has cultivated self-awareness by embodying many intellectual, psycho-theoretical, bodily, and spiritual modalities. Yoga, weightlifting, Jungian psychology, Vedanta Hinduism, Zen Buddhism, Sufism, and contemplative Christianity (to name a few) have all cycled through his repertoire. Some teachers discourage this impure form of practice; but for Wilber it has been a crucial process of defining himself. ÒCross training,Ó as he likes to call it, has built the unique wisdom of balance he shares with the world.

For Wilber, successful living is founded on balance. His Integral Life Practices, which I practice daily, create awareness of the multidimensionality of being. By exercising my physical and mental self regularly, meditating, and doing psychotherapeutic journaling, I have progressed toward my goal of balanced self-awareness. Balance Òcommunicate[s] the image of the whole to every separate portion, till that whole becomes in imagination like a spirit, every where pervading and penetrating its component parts, and giving them one definite meaning.Ó[3] That is, each portion transcends its partialness by contributing to a greater whole. Words can combine to form a sentence, and a sentence has properties and meanings that none of the words have individually. Similarly, exercising body, mind, and spirit creates a richer life than any one of these pursuits can alone. For example, Wilber has empirically demonstrated that people who meditate and lift weights progress through contemplative stages more quickly than people who only meditate. Since I have begun cross training, I have experienced the personal growth indicated by these results. Leading a balanced life will aid me in fulfilling my personal vision.

Meditation has become an integral aspect of my personal vision since Ken Wilber has influenced me. An example of his contemplative virtuosity and the incredible transformative powers of meditation are demonstrated by his ability to halt all brain activity (Video 1: http://youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4). Two exercises from Ken WilberÕs Integral Life Practice have especially helped me to cultivate compassion, which is vital to my leadership and personal visions (Video 2 http://youtube.com/watch?v=0IMxgUZJ4tA&feature=related). The first is a meditation in which you actively transform othersÕ suffering into love. Breathe in their pain and blow back to them waves of pure, unadulterated love. This is compassionate exchange. The second technique developed in Ken WilberÕs Integral training program is a writing exercise to sublimate negative unconscious drives. By acknowledging character traits in others who irritate us, we can learn to see those qualities as aspects of ourselves. Through this recognition we are able to inhabit and own the discordant characteristic. We learn to love fellow human beings by recognizing them in us and by withdrawing our projections from them. Compassion comes from inhabiting othersÕ perspectives. When you stand in anotherÕs shoes, not only can you see yourself, you can commiserate with another way of life. Perceiving with otherÕs eyes provides understanding, the seat of compassion. I am motivated toward unconditional love by following WilberÕs example, and his techniques are helping me create what I seek. 



By learning from Wilber's example, I hope to find the balance between introversion and extroversion. Wilber has demonstrated that these two qualities can coexist. His years of practice have taught him to love all beings equally and yet not to attach to any of them. The bodhisattva vow calls him to the aid of others while preserving a profound sense of equanimity. This balance between active love and detachment (not dissociation) is a struggle for me. I have a tendency to fall deeply into introspection and neglect the world, which is problematic. Of course the opposite extreme is equally troublesome. But Wilber has shown me that introspection and extroversion are really two poles of a spectrum and that by acknowledging both opposites, we can strive to find the middle. We can elect Òthe conscious generation of creativity by dwelling on the interdependence of apparently mutually exclusive opposites and the larger whole which contains them both.Ó[4] Finding balance is a process, not an end. ÒPersonal vision is not static,Ó and this balance, as both a personal goal and a guiding characteristic of my leadership vision, Òshould continue to evolve.Ó[5] 



Filling the leadership role I envision for myself involves learning from my exemplar, but it involves learning from others as well. It is valuable to recognize what many leaders from various backgrounds and in various domains of life have contributed to improving societies. By reviewing my fellow classmatesÕ writings about their respective role models, I have gained insight into what makes an inspiring and invaluable contributor to the world. Gandhi is such an important historical figure not only because he Òtried extremely hard to bring the different people of India together,Ó but also because he Òinspired [other] leaders by ÔÉcreating resonance and moving [them] with a compelling vision or shared missionÕ[6]Ó (Avni Mody). By reminding people of a greater purpose in life – one that large numbers of people could connect with – Gandhi was able to mobilize a peaceful movement for human rights and unification that would immeasurably improve Indian society. A true leader, one whose acts will continue to benefit society even after he is gone, knows how to empower those around him. Mary Kay Ash, for example, improved the lives of fellow employees by choosing Òto bring morality to the work place and thus empower women to succeed in a balanced mannerÓ (Hannah Chesser). Both Gandhi and Mary Kay motivated other people by promoting principles they believed necessary to a fulfilling life. I can learn from them, among many things, strength, certitude, and the courage to proceed with a vision.

But becoming the leader that I want to be also involves emulating people close to me. Gandhi and Mary Kay Ash have inspired thousands, but they have not impacted my life in so personal a way as friends and family have. DanielleÕs role model is her father. His Òunending enthusiasm and love for each member of his familyÓ (Danielle Oxford) are sources of utmost admiration. I aspire to become a leader who shows as much compassion as DanielleÕs father does. Compassion and unconditional love are also qualities I practice by integrating Ken WilberÕs work into my life. Just as Danielle finds warmth and caring in her father, I too find these qualities in my mother and father. The effort they have put into supporting me and guiding me toward my current place in life cannot be overstated. Their lives inspire me personally, as though I could touch their stories, in a way Ken Wilber, Mahatma Gandhi, and Mary Kay Ash cannot. Becoming the leader I want to become entails heart-to-heart relationships. Mass societal movements may be the ones recorded in the history books, but every single one of them begins with an individual relating to others the best way he knows how.

All of this talk about emulating great leaders is significant for our potentially constructive, though unsuccessful, experiment with Second Life. Second Life is a multimedia program for a multimedia world, an attempt at integrating many necessary skills, such as computer skills, communication skills, leadership abilities, creativity, and discovery learning. This process is in accord with the core purpose of a university education, which is to train individuals who will benefit society. As Peter T. Flawn announced in his annual address to the UT faculty, Òpublic universities exist to serve society,Ó[7] which means producing people who know how to live and lead in the contemporary, ever-developing world. Graduates must be fluent in the language of technology and computers and be able to communicate with facility and tolerance. When they can, Òthe doorway to rapid, intentional evolution of liberal education opens.Ó[8] Reaching others through multidimensional means – intellectually, emotionally, visually, aurally – is a skill that must be taught by universities if they are to fulfill their goal of benefiting a society now constituted of people who are Òcreators and empathizers, pattern recognizers, and meaning makers.Ó[9] Second Life reality, however, does not translate directly into this life reality, and it will never be able to transcend its virtual limitations.

         I say our trial was unsuccessful because it did not fulfill its leadership-teaching objective. Second Life is not an effective means of embodying traits exemplified by our role models and necessary for the success of contemporary leaders. Each of us had to know our role model well enough to converse as he or she would, and I believe we all did. Unfortunately this didnÕt mean that we actually behaved as them. At the conversationsÕ start, I strongly intended to speak as Ken Wilber would. But as the interactions heated up, the mask would melt away, and the puppeteerÕs own prejudices would be revealed. I periodically forgot that I was Ken Wilber. This, however, did reveal an interesting tidbit about the degree to which I have absorbed my role modelÕs teachings. If I were to relive one of the conversations and remember to remain Ken Wilber throughout, I donÕt think much of what I said would have changed at all. Though I had unconsciously fallen out of character, I still managed to quip, Òinterpersonal relationships are vital to a strong leaderÉ the mind cannot blossom Ôby itselfÕÓ (Sprinkles Timeless, Chat), a particularly Wilberesque phrase. So while Second Life may not have actually forced me to play virtual Ken Wilber, it did show me that Wilber has become a regular part of the way I think and act.

This has led me to the conclusion that our Second Life experiment was valuable because I am convinced of the Òsympathetic imaginationÕsÓ potential to encourage personal growth. By acting as our Second Life-replicated role models, we sought to create a virtual world in which we could practice being leaders. We attempted to embody our exemplarsÕ characteristics in our behavior and interactions. ÒBy actually entering into the object, so to speak, [one can] secure a momentary but complete identification with itÓ (the sympathetic imagination), which was precisely our practice with our exemplars.

This is worthwhile because temporary states can, if they are entered frequently enough, become traits. That is, by temporarily adopting our role modelsÕ characteristics we can learn to live as they do. By embodying characteristics that I do not possess but that I admire, I practice creating the life I want to live. So although I believe that our particular SL experiment did not teach applicable leadership skills, I did learn that by engaging the Òsympathetic imagination,Ó we begin to make our aspirations our reality. 



Furthermore, our role model experiment in Second Life confirmed my belief that the skills required for virtual life do not translate directly into real life competences. I believe that our SL experiment did exercise certain leadership skills, such as the assertiveness needed to maintain germane discussion. But by no means did SL exercise the comprehensive range of skills needed to be an emotionally intelligent leader as proposed by Goleman et al. I exercised no self-awareness, nor did I apply any emotional intelligence. In fact, emotion is nearly impossible to convey in this format. A leader in SL influences a cardboard world that is predictable, safe, and completely intellectual. Even so, I think that Second Life taught me some valuable lessons. I learned that I strongly dislike competitive, one-sided interaction, and I further confirmed my desire to find a balance of intelligences in my own life and in my interactions with others. ÒWe should take care not to make the intellect our God. It hasÉ no personality. It cannot lead, it can only serve,Ó[10] and unfortunately it was the only intelligence employed by Second Life. Ken WilberÕs work has helped me to discern imbalance in environments such as this one, and it is to his work that I return, rather than to the glitches and artificiality of a simulated world.

Besides the aforementioned benefits of emulating my role model and leaning from my Second Life experience, processes of creating P1 and P2 taught me the value of balanced multimedia presentations and techniques by which I can improve my own writing. I have had to articulate the weaknesses in othersÕ papers and learn to incorporate suggestions into my own.  By grading other studentsÕ P1 and P2 papers, I saw the benefit of seamlessly integrated text, images, and video. Both of DanielleÕs papers incorporated well-placed images that clearly related to the text. With graphically depicted ideas, DanielleÕs papers were accessible, persuasive, and generally more effective. Will cleverly integrated his captions into the images themselves, which subtly contributed to his P2Õs polish. From reviews given by my peers, I have learned that I can improve my writing most by smoothing transitions between paragraphs, excising superfluous verbiage, and better integrating images and captions into the textual body of the paper. An essay is more effective if its paragraphs cohere smoothly. Arguments can be convincing if they are seen but cannot be if they are hidden. I am learning the balance between the occasional poetic flourish and unnecessary ornamentation, between extending ideas and hindering them with excess baggage. The importance of balanced writing is analogous to the advantage of balance in any endeavor. A balanced multivalent approach to both writing and living is more successful and fulfilling than a monochromatic one. 



A liberal education can teach essential leadership skills that are widely applicable, even in virtual domains such as Second Life.  SL is an interesting approach to producing leaders for the benefit of a changing society, but it is not effective. I learned much less about leadership from Second Life than I have about writing from editing P1 and P2 papers. For leaders in our forward-racing world, virtual interactions may enhance their leadership capabilities, but they will never match the importance of an emotionally aware and balanced human being. I have learned that self-awareness is the foundation for strong leadership in all endeavors. Ken Wilber has helped me to realize my leadership vision, and as I learn from him how to embrace balance, self-awareness, and compassion, I increasingly create the type of life I want to live.




 

Word Count: 2457


 

List of Illustrations and Videos

Figure 1. http://photos3.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/1/e/5/3/highres_67763.jpeg

Figure 2. http://www.thegreatstory.org/charts/spiral.jpg

Video 1. http://youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4

Video 2. http://youtube.com/watch?v=0IMxgUZJ4tA&feature=related

Figure 3. Snapshot taken in Second Life

Figure 4. Snapshot taken in Second Life

Figure 5. Snapshot taken in Second Life

Figure 6. Snapshot taken in the classroom

Figure 7. Snapshot taken in my dorm room



[1] Ken Wilber, One Taste (Boston: Shambala, 2000), 14.


[2] Daniel Goleman et al, ÒPrimal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 64.


[3] John Henry Newman, ÒThe Idea of a University,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 310.


 

[4] Jerome Bump, ÒDualism and Creativity,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 189.

[5] Robert J. Lee, ÒDiscovering the Leader in You,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 78.

[6] Goleman et al, 68.

[7] Peter T. Flawn, ÒAnnual Address to the Faculty, October 16, 1984,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 306.

[8] ÒDaily Report from The Chronicle of Higher Education,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 328.

 

[9] Daniel Pink, ÒRevenge of the Right Brain,Ó in Composition and Reading in World Literature, ed. Jerome Bump (Austin: JennÕs, 2007), 331.

[10] Goleman et al, 62.