While the poetry
in this reading assignment provided good examples of the concepts
being discussed, I think it's also important evaluate the concept of
sympathetic listening in order to understand the impact the
literature will have on its readers.
Understanding
that "the sympathetic imagination is the ability of a person to
penetrate the barrier which space puts between him and his object,
and by actually entering into the object, so to speak, to secure a
momentary but complete identification with it" allows us to
understand the goal of a writer when engaging its reader in
sympathetic imagination (882). By writing works that allow for this
technique, the writer is able to reveal "the inner 'truth' and
nature of the particular, concrete object", which might be more
difficult to reveal through rational writing (882). In comparison
with using a rational approach to writing, "the true poet has no
character, no identity, he is annihilated in the character of others
and concerns himself solely with revealing their essential natures"
(882). In doing so, he flees himself and is able "to throw his soul
in to the body of another man, and be at once possessed of his
sentiments, adopt his passions, and rise to all the functions and
feelings of his situation" (882). Analyzing the means by which a
writer achieves literature capable of provoking sympathetic
imagination is important in developing each of our talents as
writers. How can we promote sympathetic imagination through our
writing?
But why should
we promote sympathetic imagination? Does it have any benefits?
Realizing that imagination can place us in the situation of another
person, reading acts as a catalyst for our imaginations. By
immersing ourselves in a different world and experience through
reading, we are able to judge actions moral or immoral. We engage
in "sympathetic participation with those who would be affected by
the external consequences, good or bad, of an act" (883). On the
other hand, constantly trying to appeal to emotion through stories
could lead to a dangerous mindset that allows us to get carried away
by constantly straying from concrete facts that can check our
emotional crusades.
It is up to us to judge
whether or not sympathetic imagination through literature enhances
the morality of the reader or leads to more dangerous affects. If
beneficial, the merit of sympathetic imagination through reading
could change educational theory for "if we teach to encourage
students to respond to the call of stories, we may find ourselves
talking more about characters and their choices and less about the
construction and deconstruction of texts" (884). Instead of trying
to identify the detailed intricacies of stories, appealing to
emotions will be the primary goal of study. How will this change
education? How will this change the ways that we learn about the
world?