Like Susan, I think one of the most important concepts
we can gain from the Brontes is the importance of cooperation and
collaboration in fostering creativity. When the Bronte children
were growing up, they created "an imagined African kingdom called
Glass Town," a world that, like glass, allowed the children to
express themselves and see each other clearly (386). Throughout the
course, we've discussed the wonder of childhood. By cooperatively
engaging in this imaginary world, the Bronte children held onto this
wonder and cultivated their imaginations and creativity. Instead of
finding stagnating comfort amongst each other, the children
challenged one another through collaboration and camaraderie.
In this way, childhood creativity is inextricably linked
the adult creativity. It's easier to be creative and daring as a
child because of the nature of childhood as opposed to as an adult
when you're generally expected to always be correct and rational.
The Brontes who went on to write acclaimed novels found their
creative side during childhood.
This reading also reveals both the connections and
disconnections between romanticism and gothic. According to
romanticists, "the spontaneous innocence of the child (and of
humanity in its childhood) is corrupted with the onset of
intellectual separation from nature, but the individual, and equally
human history, can overcome this separating by a spiral process of
regaining the lost unity, albeit cleansed and improved by the
journey. Romantic art is thus essentially one of movement, figured
in quests, journeys, and pilgrimages whose aim is to return to a
lost of home or haven" (193). On the other hand, "in the novel it
was the function of Gothic to open horizons beyond social patterns,
rational decisions, and institutionally approved emotions/ It
became then a great liberator of feeling. It acknowledged the
non-rational" (378). Both styles foster reflection on childhood.
Gothic novels, such as Jane Eyre, bring the difficulties of
childhood and family life to the forefront while promoting
reflection on our past. Romantic novels return to nature and
journeys to remind us of our childhood days. The difference lies in
the psychological relationship. How are these two concepts
related? Both styles promote nature, imagination and emotion, but
what are the benefits and disadvantages of their unique styles?
The gothic style also promotes reflection that we might
not have considered during our childhood. For example, "though
partly unconventional, Jane is nevertheless so portrayed as to evoke
new feelings rather than merely exercise old ones" (379). Instead
of remembering the agitation I felt toward my cousins as a child,
Jane Eyre prompted me to recall how helpless they made me feel.
Is it the connection we feel with the work that sparks this
different connection or is it a connection that comes with age? Or
both?
What is the difference between Ann Radcliffe, an author
who "was careful to explain away the apparently supernatural
occurrences in her stories" and M.G. Lewis who "made free use of
ghosts and demons along with scenes of cruelty and horror" (377)?
What is the significance of an author who explains the
impossibilities of her work as opposed to an author who freely
engages in the imagination?