Rachel:
Though this
is a bit of a bummer as far as her mental health is concerned, it also imbues
her with a powerful conviction¿specifically about governmental systems¿to the
extent that she has spent last semester hosting workshops on Zapatista
government at 50 colleges around the east coast, and is now deeply entrenched
in the activist community of Providence, Rhode Island.
This sentence is gigantic. That isnt always a bad thing though, and when
successful gigantic sentences are impressive. This is a succesful one, and it
is made even more successful by the quick 5 word sentence following shortly
after it. However, you don't need a comma after "east coast" because
the last part is not a complete sentence on its own.
I would revise it to read "... east coast and is now ..."
This essay is good. You don't really talk about your vision before the very
end, but I think its better to reason out the process of getting to your real
vision than to pontificate on some fake vision.
I'm left wondering what palingenesis means.
-will
Ben-
I think there are some capitalization issues towards the beginning of your
paper. In this sentence:
The department of defense alone is allotted 650 billion dollars a year
I think the "Department of Defense" should be capitalized. Likewise,
in the next sentence,Department of Argiculture should be capitalized.
Also, several sentence farther down you wrote "in State of Texas the
level..." then in the next sentence you wrote "the state of Texas
spent an average of..."
I'm fairly certain that "state of Texas" is the correct
capitalization and that they should be revised to match. I know its picky,
sorry.
I feel like this a really great paper written about something other than the
topic at hand. I read it as a great paper for a course about American
government or current events, but I couldn't find much in it outline your
vision for the future or "that which is greater than the ego."
In the revision I would add more specifics about your vision.
Thomas-
I found this sentence kind of akward:
"Without being overly sentimental, I will miss UT and everyone I have met
here, at the beginning of my pilgrimage."
There were a couple of things I would do to smooth it out. First, I think you
should axe the first clause. If you want to be sentimental, just do it. Don't
apologize for it first.
Also, the last bit doesn't flow right in my mind, I think I want to move it to
the beginning. I would revise the sentence to read something like:
"Now the first year of this pilgrimage is coming to an end, I admit I will
miss this campus and everyone I have met here."
Do with that what you like.
At the end, one bit that stuck in my head was your talk of an "ethically
minded businessman" I know that you don't have a firm vision for life, but
maybe in the revision you could talk some more about this. I think its a very
worthy goal, and somebody has to do it.
--will
Susan -
This first paragraph is beautifully written, but without any context I had
difficulty figuring out what you were trying to accomplish with it. I think it
might be more effective at the end when I have more of an idea of what you are
trying to say with it.
Also, from a philosophical standpoint, you say in the first sentence, "A
man may die, but an idea cannot be extinguished." Since it was the first
sentence I thought about it a lot, and I'm sorry, but I think that
"ideas" can definitely be extinguished. One example that immediately
comes to mind is the idea that the earth is flat. I believe this idea has been
extinguished by the ideas of modern science. Later in the paragraph you write
"[ideas] can both create and destroy." This is definitely valid, and
I believe one thing that ideas can destroy is other ideas.
"I want to dedicate my energy, my talent, my life to the preservation of
life, to liberate life from the oppression of fear from hunger and
disease."
This sentence is good, because it clearly articulates your vision. However, I
think it runs on a bit. Perhaps you could split it up or remove some of it.
I'll revise it as so:
"I want to dedicate my energy and talent to the preservation of life.
Specifically, I want to liberate life from fear, hunger and disease."
This was a good paper and, after the first paragraph, it was clear and concrete
in outlining your plan. Good goal also.
--will
Noel:
I think there are some verb tense issues in the first paragraph, specifically
this sentence:
" It¿s hard to place my finger on the exact catalyst that sparked all my
future ambitions, but was I, an ¿acting machine,¿ no different? "
I think the use of the past tense might not be neccesary. Perhaps you could
revise this to read something like:
"Its hard to place my finger on the exact catalyst that first sparked all
my ambitions, but I worry that I too am solely by a desire for attention."
I kinda liked how you threw in the part about being an acting machine but I
couldnt really find a way to work it in without sacrificing flow.
Later on, "My so-called dream in shreds, I now had no idea what to do with
myself."
I would revise to read "With my so-called dream in ..."
In terms of the revision, I think you should definitely add more specifics
about your vision. You spend a lot of time talking about events in the past,
but I didn't hear as much about the future. Perhaps you can work in hammering
that past into a unified future.
--will
"Okay,
I am supposed to write about a pilgrimage, a vision, a connection with
something higher than myself, a torch to bring to the next generation."
I'm not sure if your first sentence is technically a run on, but it goes on a
bit long for to be a strong opening. In the future, when you list things like
this, I think its much more powerful to keep the list to 3 elements. Something
in the essence of the number 3 allows you to really hammer your point without
botching the flow.
In this instance though, I think you should lose the whole first paragraph and
write a new one. It doesn't really introduce anything, and in fact I was kind
of angry that you got me all excited about a grand and unheard of vision before
you dropped me back into the first one. Not that there is anything wrong with a
life devoted to christianity, but I think its best not to lie to your reader in
the first paragraph.
So yeah, I would revise the whole paragraph to introduce your true vision and
segue into the next. I know thats pretty vague, I apologize.
In terms of the body, I think you need more paragraph breaks. Its hard to
follow as it is.
I think a more effective conclusion would involve your interpretation of what
the bible says, not merely quoting it at length.
Best of luck.
-will
This is awesome. I couldn't really
find anything wrong except I would remove "me" in this sentence:
"I¿m not seeking the prestige of a degree in medicine from Harvard or Yale
to justify me doing something that bores people to hear about at cocktail
parties"
revised to:
"... Harvard or Yale to justify doing something that ..."
You're vision is realistic and clearly articulated. In the revision perhaps you
could add more to the end about the bond you feel to your home.
--will
Vanessa-
"In my particular situation, I feel that the best way
to pass on the gift I have been given is to reach out to people who may not
have the same opportunities to learn that I have had."
I know Rachel commented on this sentence but I have a different idea. In this
section, "people who may not have had..." I think that these people
clear have not had the same opportunities and you might as well be direct in
saying that. So I think you should remove the "may"
I would revise it to something kind of like:
"In my particular situation, I feel that the best way to pass on the gift
I've been given is to reach out to people who have not had the same learning
opportunities as I have had"
This is still kind of wordy though. You might want to revise my revision.
I like and share your goal of traveling.
-will
Sharon-
"This
leads to a few problems because of the abstract nature of the epiphany."
Sorry, but I don't know what this sentence means. I think its partly because
you havent mentioned any epiphanies at all, and then you start with THE
epiphany. I am stuff wondering which one it is, what its nature is, and why its
nature is abstract. Becuase of all these questions I dont really know how to
revise it, other than suggest that you clarify and introduce the idea a bit.
So for expanding your paper I suggest that you do it at the beginning.