|
Reviewer
|
Back-Evals
|
|
|
The reviewer just commented about my thesis and not on the rest of the focus
of my paper. I had some sort of focus, but it was lost in some of the other
things in my paper. The review could have been more helpful it a thesis was
suggested or something was suggested about how to make my paper more focused.
|
|
Reviewer 2
|
Great review of my paper. Really followed the focus of the paper and told me,
from the reader''''s perspective, how the paper came off as. Going paragraph
by paragraph and addressing the focus of the paper, ensuring that each pargh.
added to the overall paper was helpful.
|
|
Reviewer 3
|
Great review as well! Helped me understand where I needed to work on to make
my paper more focused.
|
|
Reviewer 4
|
Great review! Really came off as an honest review, telling me what they did
and didn''''t understand about my paper. This really helped me make my paper
more focused and develop a coherent thesis.
|
|
Reviewer 5
|
Reviewer didn''''t really say what was wrong with the intro or concl. Just
mentioning there was some problem didn''''t really help me find out what the
problem was.
|
|
Reviewer 6
|
The reviewer conveyed his/her sense of confusion with the focus of the paper.
This was helpful in helping me change it.
|
|
Reviewer
|
Back-Evals
|
|
|
Great review! The outline of what my paper should look like was helpful. I
made some sort of outline before I started writing, but I''''m not sure if
that organization came off effectively. This review helped me!
|
|
Reviewer 2
|
Going paragraph by paragraph helped me understand how my organization came
off to the reader. This allowed me to fix my organization to be more clear
and coherent.
|
|
Reviewer 3
|
This review was useful, but it was mainly just general. These comments make
me look over the organization of my paper, but it didn''''t help me zero in
on the problem.
|
|
Reviewer 4
|
I felt my organization was my strong point, and this review affirmed that.
However, the review also commented that i needed to work on my thesis
paragraph.
|
|
Reviewer 5
|
This review did not give me any insight of how I could improve my
organization
|
|
Reviewer 6
|
This review informed me I had some small problems with my organization but
didn''''t tell me how i could improve each paragraph to move forward.
|
|
Reviewer
|
Back-Evals
|
|
|
With the flow, pointing out specific problems was helpful.
|
|
Reviewer 2
|
Great, detailed review of the flow of my paper! Thanks for catching some of
my mistakes and suggesting places i could improve.
|
|
Reviewer 3
|
Didn''''t really comment on anything specific. Telling me to reread
doesn''''t help me fully utilize the idea of peer-editing/reviewing.
|
|
Reviewer 4
|
Thanks for pointing out some of the small mistakes i had. Overall, the
comment about choppiness helped b/c it make me look over not only the flow
but also the org and focus.
|
|
Reviewer 5
|
Good review of my flow. Very detailed and precise.
|
|
Reviewer 6
|
Good review that helped me work on my flow. It was helpful to know where
there was awkward wording and break in fluidity.
|