Psychological Type Essay






P2B

Architecture: Take From the Past,
Enjoy in the Present, and Improve for the Future




Ever since I can remember, people have asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up, and regardless of my age, whether eight or eighteen, they expected me to have a ready answer. “Doctor” was a good answer, and so was “lawyer.” Answers like “artist” or “inventor” were tolerable, though often accompanied by laughs which seemed to imply that I was delightfully naïve. However, there was one answer that was not acceptable. If I shrugged and said I didn’t know what I wanted to be or what I wanted to do, whichever relative or family friend had asked the question would gasp in disbelief: “What! At the age of six, you don’t know what you want to do for a living?” Last year, these relatives were reincarnated in the form of college essay prompts, except there was much more than family approval riding on a correct answer. These essays expected me to define myself, my pursuits, and my life goals. I found myself torn, frustrated, and a little scared: for the life of me, I could not pin down any one pursuit or interest that defined who I was and meant everything to me. Unlike my friends – the cello prodigy, the hopelessly romantic poet, the devout philosopher – I didn’t feel like I had a specific calling. In a sense, I enjoyed most everything but wasn’t drawn to any subject or activity in particular. I was equally intrigued by art and by biology; I enjoyed my calculus class as much as my government course; and I could see myself pursuing a number of possible majors. There were simply too many things I was interested in.

As senior year progressed, I’d finally had enough of liking everything but loving nothing. In an effort to clarify the amorphous concept that was my passion, I sat down and literally wrote down all of the subjects and fields that interested me, why I found them appealing, and what about them made them meaningful to me. My interests ranged from biology to music to psychology, but there were so many that I was hesitant to claim that they were all “passions.” However, the more I studied them, the more my diverse interests seemed to share one or two underlying reasons they were important to me. The first was that they helped me understand people, from their genetics to their emotions. However, the second reason these diverse pursuits were important to me was a little more elusive. Several of my interests were all about beautiful things such as music, art, languages, and dance. I felt strongly about these in and of themselves, but more importantly, I had a burning desire to participate in creating their beauty. Yet even when I had discovered these two undercurrents of understanding people and creating beauty, I was still unclear about how I could unify a passion that was made up of such seemingly disparate interests. I decided to examine design, one of my strongest interests, in the hopes that I could find some way that the two overlapped in this context. Furthermore, I hoped to use what I discovered about my passion for design to understand and define my true passion as a whole.

Though we all know it when we see it, can sense its presence in a building or an object, and generally appreciate it, design is difficult to explain. To me, design is part of a process and a way of solving problems cleverly. Like good taste, it is something that can be brought to the development and execution of a plan. It can be used in the creation of anything – utensils, graphics, buildings, rooms, cars, household objects, web pages, and packaging are only a handful of examples. However, no matter to what design is applied, I appreciate its creativity, its ability to evoke emotion, and its way of resonating with us, but I am also driven to design myself.

Design’s creativity is one of its most defining aspects. Essentially, design is about problem solving, and good design is about going beyond what is normal, expected, and easy in solving problems. A good designer looks at problems in new ways, and creates solutions that are fresh, innovative, and unique. A large component of this originality comes from understanding how people interact with their world, and finding ways of making that interaction easier, faster, or more beautiful. Take, for example, a paper lantern with an open flame. This presents an obvious problem, as fire and paper make a dangerous combination. However, a hanging lamp constructed of solar cells connected to LED bulbs and powered, simply, by light [1] accomplishes the same thing. Or, consider the needs of an individual who travels frequently. Imu design, a Finnish design team, understood those needs and met them with an ingenious solution. Their elegant cabinet is much more than it appears to be. Each drawer is a suitcase, easy to pre-pack and ready to go at any moment. [2] In examples like these and others, I found that design’s creativity echoed some of my desire to understand people, because the effectiveness of design is based largely on understanding how people think, what they need, and how they interact with their environment.

Another aspect of design that I admire and that requires an understanding of people is its ability to evoke emotion, intrigue us, and change the way we feel. Personally, I know that design has a strong influence on my feelings at the time: the powerful presence of a beautifully designed building can make me sigh, the grace of an innovatively designed chair can send shivers up my spine, and the perfect composition of a well-designed poster can make me tear up. We have all been struck by a particular work of art before, perhaps a painting with bold colors, a particularly clever advertisement, or even something as simple as an interesting book cover that made us want to read the book. All of these responses are examples of how designers understand their audience. Knowing what color combinations will make us respond to a painting, what visual organization or verbal quips will make us react to an advertisement, and what sort of image on the cover will make us reach for a book are all important for a designer to know.

Because designers have this innate understanding of people, they are able to  spark a feeling of connection between the object they design and the viewer. Architects, for example, can change the way we feel in a building because they understand how we experience a space. Their manipulation of the space makes our experience of the room or building infinitely more meaningful. One place that has evoked emotions strongly in me was the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin . Constructed of 2,711 concrete slabs arranged in a grid, the memorial contains no symbols and no written dedication. [3] It is simply a place. Walking among the slabs, which start a few feet tall and rise to tower several feet high, I found that the sounds of the city faded, the concrete around me felt cold, and I began to feel uneasy. This was all part of the architect’s intention of course, but being able to physically experience this memorial made it much more meaningful to me than a statue or plaque would have been.

What is it about design, and more generally art, that makes it have such a strong effect on us? It resonates with us in a way that most other areas of human creation do not and can not. For example, it would be difficult for many of us to appreciate a mathematical proof, however elegant it may be, or to be blown away by a new idea in philosophy. Unlike these two examples, art does not require that the viewer have a great deal of previous knowledge or experience with the subject in order to enjoy the piece of artwork. Art and design are both so universal that, regardless of our age or our knowledge of art history, we can cull some meaning from the pieces we see. We do not necessarily need an explanation, because we can see aspects of our own life reflected in the work or we can simply enjoy the aesthetic beauty of art.

Design’s flexibility of interpretation as well as its beauty make me sure that it is not only an authentic pursuit, but a worthwhile one as well. Walter Pater extends this idea of art as a worthy passion in his conclusion to The Renaissance. As he explains it, our passions help us to experience the most in every moment by “yield[ing to us] a quickened, multiplied consciousness.” [4] It is easy to see how art and design do this: by showing us a new perspective on life or offering a fresh way of thinking about something we take for granted, art pushes us to reexamine our world. This new perspective is invaluable, since – purely as a result of habit – many of us find ourselves thinking inside a narrowing set of assumptions and beliefs that may not accurately reflect the actual context we are in. Essentially, it is the combination of all of these things that I appreciate about design as a whole: its ability to grab our attention, evoke our emotions, resonate with us in a powerful way, and prompt us to view the world in new ways.

          Though I enjoy simply appreciating art and design, I find designing things myself to be even more rewarding. Designing resonates deeply with my underlying passion for creating the beauty I love. Though I can appreciate all different types of design, I’ve found that my own, personal calling is graphic and layout design. Graphic design combines words and images, with the focus on the images, to convey a message. Its goal is “to give order to information, form to ideas, expression and feeling to artifacts that document human experience.” [5] As I understand it, layout design normally focuses more closely on the text and is used when designing books or websites. In layout design, some of the most important tasks include organizing the text in an interesting way, choosing fonts, and integrating graphics.

What makes me certain that designing is part of my passion is the way I feel when I do it. I experience a concentration, energy, and focus when I design that I rarely feel with any other sort of project. I am largely self-taught, and the process of experimentation and learning is invigorating. I feel a sense of “flow,” which psychologist and coiner of the word Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi defined as “being completely involved in an activity for its own sake. The ego falls away. Time flies…Your whole being is involved, and you're using your skills to the utmost.” [6] When I design, I become so focused and I enjoy it so much that I am willing to completely set aside other tasks and to give up sleep to pursue it. I thrive on the type of problem solving involved in graphic design, and the challenge is enthralling. I feel immensely, entirely gratified in the process of creating a graphic or a page. Unlike other tasks that often drain me of energy, graphic design energizes me. It’s the mental equivalent of a caffeine boost, and I can bring the energy I get from designing to other tasks. All of the emotions I experience when I design make it feel like an “authentic” passion to me – I can honestly say I love doing it.

After examining the way understanding people and creating beauty played out in design, I realize that the two components aren’t separate at all, but strongly connected. In the context of design, understanding people is an important part of a designer’s job. In a general context, understanding people is a significant component of creating something beautiful. What makes something -- whether a painting, a building, or a book -- truly beautiful is the artist’s ability to understand and connect with us through the piece. Something about viewing the painting, standing in the building, or finishing the book resonates with us, and that connection we experience feels fundamentally meaningful.

As I thought about it, I realized that the combination of these two things was much closer to my passion than any one of the individual pursuits I found interesting. Striving to understand my fellow human beings and creating meaningful connects, whether in the form of scientific research or beautiful design, is what my passion is truly about. Though that passion is hard to explain to my relatives in a satisfactorily short answer – and they still don’t think it has quite the same ring as “doctor” – I’ve found that it suits me much better.

 

Word Count: 2,070

Words Added: 378

 

Picture Sources

1. http://www.thesmallstakes.com/gallery.php?page=3#

2. “Solar Lamion,” Dwell 6, no. 9 (2006): 78.

3. http://www.imudesign.org/image_bank_large_takeout_1.html

4. http://www.knoll.com/products/product.jsp?prod_id=145

5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:HolocaustMahnmalLuft.jpg

6. Picture by Lauren Rosales

7. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/60/Saul_bass_goldenarm.jpg/180px-Saul_bass_goldenarm.jpg

8. Picture by the author

 

[1] “Solar Lamion,” Dwell 6, no. 9 (2006): 78.

[2] “Imu Design.” Imu Design. 2006. http://www.imudesign.org/designs_large_takebot_1.html.

[3] “Memorial to the Murder Jews of Europe,” 2006, http://www.holocaust-mahnmal.de/.

[4] Jerome Bump “‘Conclusion’ to Renaissance by Walter Pater,” 2006, http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~bump/E603/PaterConclusion.html.

[5]   Meggs, Philip B., 'A history of graphic design'. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1983

[6] John Geirland, “Go With The Flow,” Wired 4, no. 9, September 1996, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.09/czik.html.